Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen leaching losses increased significantly with irrigation amount.

A claim from Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field Section B Soil and plant science · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen leaching losses increased significantly with irrigation amount.

Treatment
irrigation amounte0
Outcome
¹⁵N leaching lossese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ¹⁵N leaching losses increased significantly with increases in irrigation amount, irrigation water salinity, and N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1520
t0

“Cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field Section B Soil and plant science

Wei Min; Huijuan Guo; Zhiqiang Hu; et al. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 2017

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-6f9bb8f88e4bae06b91d1e86701893f2b92c3e714d4842a1d61a07cb4122d6b3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

irrigation · environment: emissions · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.