Claim · model-written summary
The Si-60 promoter was predicted to contain no AreA-binding site.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Interactor
- Si-60e0pathogen
- Gene
- AreAe0
- Outcome
- AreA-binding site (GATA box)e0
Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bioinformatics analysis for cis-acting elements suggested that the promoters of the US-41 and Si-60 isolates contain one and no AreA-binding site (GATA box), respectively.”
t0“Colletotrichum coccodes”
e1“Colletotrichum coccodes (Wallr.) S. Hughes, the causal agent of black dot on potato and anthracnose on tomato, reduces yield and crop quality.”
Title
BAT‐HEN BEN‐DANIEL; DUDY BAR‐ZVI; LEAH TSROR (LAHKIM) Molecular Plant Pathology 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00740.x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Highly aggressive C. coccodes isolates secreted detectable PL at 6 h versus 12 h for mildly aggressive isolates.
- Intervention effect CcpelA disruption reduced aggressiveness of C. coccodes toward tomato fruit.
- Intervention effect CcpelA disruption impaired PL secretion and extracellular activity.
- Intervention effect CcpelA overexpression increased Si-60 aggressiveness.
- Intervention effect CcpelA overexpression increased Si-60 PL secretion.
- Observation US-41 and Si-60 CcpelA encode identical proteins.
- Observation US-41 and Si-60 CcpelA promoters differ.
- Observation The US-41 promoter was predicted to contain one AreA-binding site.
- Observation CcpelA transcript was higher in US-41 than Si-60.