Claim · model-written summary
In 2001 Intimate Intercrop disease AUDPC exceeded both Strip treatments and sprayed monocrop.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Intimate Intercrope0
- Outcome
- AUDPCe0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- two Strip treatments and the Monocrop Sprayede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intimate Intercrop had an intermediate AUDPC, which was significantly greater than the two Strip treatments and the Monocrop Sprayed.”
t0“intercropping corn and peanut on peanut leaf spot management”
Title
Laura Elizabeth Duffie NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) 2003
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation Early leaf spot appeared near the inoculation site 22 days after inoculation in 2000 and 23 days in 2001.
- Observation Intimate Intercrop reached approximately 41% mean disease incidence by day 63 in 2000.
- Observation Monocrop reached approximately 41% mean disease incidence by day 63 in 2000.
- Intervention effect In 2000 disease incidence AUDPC was greater for Intimate Intercrop than Strip Old.
- Intervention effect In 2000 disease incidence AUDPC was greater for Monocrop than Strip Old.
- Intervention effect In 2000 Strip Old disease AUDPC was greater than sprayed monocrop.
- Observation Natural Cercosporidium personatum populations caused a late leaf spot epidemic.
- Observation Monocrop reached 15% disease incidence at 62 days after inoculation in 2001.
- Intervention effect In 2001 Monocrop had significantly higher disease AUDPC than the other four treatments.
- Intervention effect Strip New had greater disease AUDPC than the spray treatment in 2001.
- Intervention effect Strip Old disease AUDPC was statistically similar to the sprayed treatment.
- Observation A second late leaf spot epidemic in 2001 was less severe than the 2000 epidemic.
- Intervention effect Disease and intercropping did not significantly affect peanut yield in 2000.
- Intervention effect Intimate Intercrop significantly depressed peanut yield in 2001.
- Intervention effect Intercropping showed neither benefit nor reduction in corn yield.
- Association Treatment and distance interacted significantly during the last four sampling days of each early leaf spot epidemic.
- Method / resource Disease gradient models fit best when log distance was used in both years.
- Association Calculated velocity increased with increasing distance from the inoculum source.
- Observation Strip New had the highest calculated epidemic velocity at all distances in 2001.