Claim · model-written summary
Development time did not differ significantly among cultivars.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Material
- different cultivarse1
- Outcome
- development timee0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Soybean Cultivars”
e0“no significant differences in survival or development time were found”
e1“different cultivars”
Title
Soybean Cultivars Evaluated for Resistance to Mexican Bean Beetle in Southern Indiana123
G. J. Hallman; C. R. Edwards; J. E. Foster Journal of Economic Entomology 1977. doi:10.1093/jee/70.3.316
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Association Soybean cultivars differed significantly in field defoliation by Epilachna varivestis.
- Observation PI 80837 had 13% defoliation.
- Observation Kent had 20% defoliation.
- Observation Culter 71 had 21% defoliation.
- Observation Calland had 21% defoliation.
- Observation Williams had 24% defoliation.
- Observation Wooedworth had 27% defoliation.
- Observation Wayne had 27% defoliation.
- Observation Bonus had 32% defoliation.
- Association Beetle pupal weight differed significantly among cultivars in laboratory and field.
- Association Soybean defoliation was greater in the vegetative-stage beetle generation than the reproductive-stage generation in four of six tests.
- Association Pupal weight differences varied among locations.
- Association Survival did not differ significantly among cultivars.
- Association Pupal weight and developmental time correlated significantly in the laboratory.
- Association Pupal weight did not correlate well with developmental time in the field.
- Association Pupal weight did not correlate well with defoliation percentage in the field.