Seed germination rate did not depend on seeding scheme.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment: seeding schemee0
Outcome: Seed germination ratese0
Direction: did not depende0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Daucus carota* · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“Seed germination rates also did not depend on the seeding scheme”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–810

t0
“Economic feasibility of a narrow row method of growing carrot seeds at non-transplanting culture in the conditions of Stavropol region”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–134

Title

Economic feasibility of a narrow row method of growing carrot seeds at non-transplanting culture in the conditions of Stavropol region

S M Sirota; V A Stepanov; V A Podorogin; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012065

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect MaterMacc sowing provided the necessary carrot plant density and high overwinter survival.
Intervention effect MaterMacc sowing produced first and second branching types with more complete seeds.
Intervention effect Seeding schemes did not significantly affect thousand seed mass.
Observation Greatest seed germination occurred in the control and MaterMacc treatment.
Intervention effect MaterMacc technology increased seed yield 3.2 times.
Intervention effect MaterMacc technology reduced seed cost threefold.
Observation MaterMacc technology attained profitability of 288.8%.

Record rev-70ef6bcd741cc8cbdc1e4139acdaaecee4ac3f59d696da194cd0eca236348684 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer