Claim · model-written summary
Band placement increased benefit cost ratio relative to broadcasting in plant and ratoon crops.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- band placemente0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.25 and 1.85e0
- Comparator
- broadcasting methode0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Verbatim
t0“Sugarcane”
e0“band placement method of application noted significantly higher net income (? 219452 and ? 222569 /ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.25 and 1.85) against broadcasting method of fertilizer application i.e. net income (? 155273 and ? 192163 /ha) and Benefit cost ratio (0.93 and 1.67) in plant and ratoon crops, respectively”
Title
Satendra Kumar; S.C. Singh; V.K. Shukla Agrica 2025. doi:10.5958/2394-448x.2025.00022.0
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Band placement increased net income relative to broadcasting in plant and ratoon crops.
- Intervention effect Seven split nutrient application increased cultivation cost by 6.42 percent.
- Intervention effect Seven split nutrient application increased gross income by 23.76 and 19.22 percent in plant and ratoon crops.
- Intervention effect Seven split nutrient application increased net profit by 42.88 and 27.28 percent.
- Intervention effect Seven split nutrient application increased benefit cost ratio by 35.12 and 19.50 percent.