Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ground-level cutting produced the greatest yield reduction.

A claim from EFFECTS OF ACUTE SIMULATED AND ACUTE GRASSHOPPER (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) DAMAGE ON GROWTH RATES AND YIELD OF SPRING WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM) · 1983

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground-level cutting produced the greatest yield reduction.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Ground-level cutting of plantse0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
greatest reductione0
Comparator
grasshopper damage and artificial stripping of leaf materiale0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ground-level cutting of plants resulted in the greatest reduction in plant biomass and crop yield, while grasshopper damage and artificial stripping of leaf material did not result in as severe a reduction in either biomass or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–510
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121

Title

EFFECTS OF ACUTE SIMULATED AND ACUTE GRASSHOPPER (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) DAMAGE ON GROWTH RATES AND YIELD OF SPRING WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM)

O. O. Olfert; M. K. Mukerji The Canadian Entomologist 1983. doi:10.4039/ent115629-6

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-73f154756f6175daa2d79b5cd464c2c95d93da534fbbab1b681351c12fbb5a73 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 33 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

84 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.