Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 24% reduction in seed-colton yields.

A claim from Effect of Cotton Seedling Infection by Cotton-leaf Crumple Virus on Subsequent Growth and Yield · 1986

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 24% reduction in seed-colton yields.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
seed-colton yieldse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants exhibited a reduction in the number of bolls per plant (27%) and seed-colton yields (24%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–847
t0

“Cotton Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25

Title

Effect of Cotton Seedling Infection by Cotton-leaf Crumple Virus on Subsequent Growth and Yield

G. D. Butler; J. K. Brown; T. J. Henneberry Journal of Economic Entomology 1986. doi:10.1093/jee/79.1.208

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-73ffdb66f01e4187679f8181c413f7af63b96472d740918caf48ad0af0d9c1ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.