Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T3 produced significantly greater leaves per hill and leaf area index than other straw treatments.

A claim from Performance of Rice Straw Management and Nitrogen Scheduling on Yield and Growth Parameters of Summer Rice in Chhattisgarh Plain · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced significantly greater leaves per hill and leaf area index than other straw treatments.

Taxon
summer riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
incorporation of rice straw 5 t ha-1 by MB plough once + disc harrowing twice fb irrigation at 30 DBT (T3)e0
Outcome
number of leaves hill-1 and LAIe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves hill-1 and LAI was recorded significantly higher under treatment incorporation of rice straw 5 t ha-1 by MB plough once + disc harrowing twice fb irrigation at 30 DBT (T3) as compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–898
t0

“summer rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 95–106

Title

Performance of Rice Straw Management and Nitrogen Scheduling on Yield and Growth Parameters of Summer Rice in Chhattisgarh Plain

G.P. Banjara; D.K. Chandrakar; Birendra Tigga International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.810.127

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-76cd05a696a26fbb8cfe187cc76c33e83bbbc714e85c95a29302162260c725b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.