Method / resourcemodel-written summary

Cluster analysis did not group maize populations precisely with expectations based on their agro-ecological groups.

A claim from Comparison of AFLP and SSR markers for genetic diversity studies in maize populations · 2019

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster analysis did not group maize populations precisely with expectations based on their agro-ecological groups.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
cluster analysise6
Direction
did not groupe6
Comparator
expectations based upon their agro-ecological groupse6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“18 maize populations belonging to six different agro-ecological groups we report on a comparison of AFLP and SSR techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–138
e6

“The cluster analysis did not group populations precisely with expectations based upon their agro-ecological groups, although a much better agreement was accomplished with AFLP analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1366

Title

Comparison of AFLP and SSR markers for genetic diversity studies in maize populations

Ignjatović-Micić, Dragana; Mladenović Drinić, Snežana; Nikolić, Ana; et al. RIK (Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje (Belgrade, Serbia)) 2019

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-784b5b5c63458d0983ee5412cfa023b115e664451fc8092ba4f11563be0786ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer