Associationmodel-written summary

Wetness index was lowest in low stable yield zones, higher in high stable zones, and highest in unstable zones.

A claim from Drivers of within-field spatial and temporal variability of crop yield across the US Midwest · 2018

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wetness index was lowest in low stable yield zones, higher in high stable zones, and highest in unstable zones.

Outcome
average topographic wetness indexe0e1
Direction
lower in low and stable yield areas, high in high and stable yield areas and even higher in unstable yield arease0e1
Setting
US Midweste0e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the average topographic wetness index in the different stability zones is lower in low and stable yield areas, high in high and stable yield areas and even higher in unstable yield areas (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–2007
e1

“maize, soybean, wheat and cotton in the US Midwest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–746

Title

Drivers of within-field spatial and temporal variability of crop yield across the US Midwest

Bernardo Maestrini; Bruno Basso Scientific Reports 2018. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32779-3

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-7892f3c4f9cedc060f38003c18ccdd5ebaf5a66e5dc5a761fb5612b37399bbd3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer