Claim · model-written summary
SRI yielded 3.77 versus 4.52 tonnes/ha under traditional cultivation.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SRIe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 3.77 against 4.52 tonnes/hae0
- Comparator
- traditional method of cultivatione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“low plant density and high labour cost of SRI resulted in lower yield (3.77 against 4.52 tonnes/ha) and net returns (₹2 650 against ₹ 9 312/ha) compared to traditional method of cultivation”
t0“rice”
Title
P C MOHAPATRA; M DIN; B C PARIDA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2012. doi:10.56093/ijas.v82i3.15979
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect SRI net returns were ₹2 650 versus ₹ 9 312/ha for traditional cultivation.
- Intervention effect Mechanized SRI planting and weeding raised productivity to 4.24 tonnes/ha.
- Intervention effect Mechanized SRI planting and weeding raised profitability to ₹ 12 192/ ha.
- Observation The mechanized system required older seedlings.
- Observation The mechanized system required increased hill density.
- Observation The mechanized system required four rather than one plants per hill.
- Intervention effect Drum seeding had lower planting cost than the comparison planter.
- Intervention effect Drum seeding had lower total production cost.
- Intervention effect Weeded plots had double the water use efficiency of unweeded plots, averaging 0.61 kg/m3.
- Intervention effect Weeded plots had double the grain yield of unweeded plots, averaging 4.18 tonnes/ha.
- Intervention effect Weeder operation cost ₹ 2 509 compared with ₹ 5 688/ha for manual weeding.
- Intervention effect The star-cono weeder produced the highest grain productivity.
- Intervention effect The star-cono weeder produced the highest profitability.