Claim · model-written summary
Model 1 made unrealistic predictions under acute nitrogen deficiency.
- Taxon
- cabbage and lettuce
Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Lactuca sativat0 - Outcome
- predictions became unrealistice0
- Comparator
- conditions of acute N deficiencye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“its predictions became unrealistic when extrapolated to conditions of acute N deficiency”
t0“cabbage and lettuce plants”
Title
I Burns Annals of Botany 1994. doi:10.1006/anbo.1994.1104
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Method / resource The two models fit growth data with little statistical difference.
- Method / resource Model 1 parameter estimates conflicted with assumptions about growth physiology.
- Method / resource Model 2 offered a better mechanistic interpretation of growth data.
- Method / resource Model 2 predictions closely matched observed growth rate and nitrogen relationships for whole plants and shoots.
- Association Internal nitrogen reserve size governed nitrogen transfer to roots as deficiency developed.
- Observation Nitrogen transfer to roots was greater in cabbage than lettuce.