Claim · model-written summary
The system labeled N had 4.77% overall energy efficiency.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“18.23% for DDP, 6.88% for CHDP, and 4.77% for N”
e1“The overall energy efficiency”
e2“forage yield of maize”
Title
Alfredo López-Vázquez; Martin Cadena-Zapata; Santos Campos-Magaña; et al. Agronomy 2019. doi:10.3390/agronomy9040189
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation DDP used an average of 379.75 MJ of energy per hectare.
- Observation CHDP used an average of 135.01 MJ of energy per hectare.
- Observation NT used an average of 26.43 MJ of energy per hectare.
- Observation DDP applied 400 J kg−1 to the soil mass.
- Observation CHDP applied 255.13 J kg−1 to the soil mass.
- Observation NT applied 237.8 J kg−1 to the soil mass.
- Observation DDP had 18.23% overall energy efficiency.
- Observation CHDP had 6.88% overall energy efficiency.
- Intervention effect NT significantly decreased bulk density after three years.
- Intervention effect Dry matter yield did not differ significantly among tillage systems.
- Recommendation The authors identify CHDP and NT as options to save 64% to 93% energy compared with DDP in semiarid Mexico.