Claim · model-written summary
Rhizosphere physicochemical properties differed significantly between the two plants.
- Taxon
- Distichlis spicata and Suaeda foliosa
.jpg?width=60)
Distichlis spicataSuaeda foliosae1 - Outcome
- physicochemical propertiese0
- Comparator
- two native plantse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Our results revealed significant differences in the physicochemical properties between the rhizosphere soils of the two native plants.”
e1“including Distichlis spicata and Suaeda foliosa”
Title
Plant species-specific rhizobiome assembly in the hyper-arid Atacama Desert
J. Fortt; J. Castro-Severyn; A. Choque; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2025. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1587491
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation D. spicata rhizosphere soil had higher electrical conductivity.
- Observation S. foliosa rhizosphere soil had elevated ammonium.
- Observation Four bacterial groups dominated both plant rhizospheres, with different relative abundance.
- Observation Halobacteria were highly represented in D. spicata soil.
- Observation Firmicutes were highly represented in S. foliosa soil.
- Observation Enterococcus occurred only in S. foliosa rhizosphere.
- Observation Natrinema was more abundant beneath D. spicata than S. foliosa, 33.4% versus 1.5%.
- Association D. spicata microbial community was strongly influenced by electrical conductivity.
- Association S. foliosa microbial community correlated with ammonium levels.