Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Coriandrum sativum plants supplemented with chemical fertilizer showed significantly improved growth performance compared with controls.

A claim from Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are an alternative to the application of chemical fertilizer in the production of the medicinal and aromatic plantCoriandrum sativumL. · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriandrum sativum plants supplemented with chemical fertilizer showed significantly improved growth performance compared with controls.

Taxon
Coriandrum sativumCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
supplemented with chemical fertilizere1
Outcome
growth performancese1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
controlse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the medicinal and aromatic plant Coriandrum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–530
e1

“Plants inoculated with R. irregularis and those supplemented with chemical fertilizer displayed significantly improved growth performances when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–962

Title

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are an alternative to the application of chemical fertilizer in the production of the medicinal and aromatic plantCoriandrum sativumL.

Rui S. Oliveira; Ying Ma; Inês Rocha; et al. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 2016. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1153447

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-80f1c072a67e13dd1b0ad40eac2c16ab5cfa64d4607457878b6c88525dccad33 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.