Claim · model-written summary
The ranking of wine scores for vineyard zones changed between seasons.
- Taxon
- winegrape
Vitis viniferae0 - Outcome
- ranking of wine scores for the various zonese6
- Qualifier
- changed between seasonse6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spatial variability in winegrape yield was studied over several vintages”
e6“the ranking of wine scores for the various zones changed between seasons”
Title
Understanding variability in winegrape production systems
R.G.V. BRAMLEY; R.P. HAMILTON Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00006.x
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Winegrape yield was highly variable within a year, typically about tenfold (2 to 20 t/ha).
- Observation Patterns of winegrape yield variation were temporally stable across seasons.
- Method / resource K-means clustering was more statistically robust than the yield target method for zoning.
- Observation Incorporating expert knowledge into the yield target method helped managers accommodate abnormal events.
- Observation Wine characteristics varied from zone to zone within winegrape blocks.
- Recommendation Zonal vineyard management is recommended for winegrape blocks rather than uniform management.