Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis recovery was not associated with carbohydrate level.
- Compound
- carbohydrate levele0
- Outcome
- Plant recovery from chillinge0
- Direction
- did not appear to be associatede0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Plant recovery from chilling did not appear to be associated with carbohydrate level”
Title
L. C. Purcell; D. A. Ashley; H. R. Boerma Crop Science 1987. doi:10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183x002700010023x
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Whole-plant cooling reduced plant photosynthetic capacity nearly 100% after one night.
- Intervention effect Whole-plant cooling reduced leaf photosynthetic capacity by 60 to 80% at R2.
- Intervention effect Whole-plant cooling reduced leaf photosynthetic capacity by 80 to 100% at R6.
- Observation Low PPC and LPC persisted until after one night of recovery at 19°C.
- Intervention effect Whole-plant cooling affected photosynthesis more than root-only cooling.
- Association Photosynthesis decrease was associated with greater water stress under whole-plant than root-only cooling.
- Observation All cultivars recovered more than 90% PPC at R2 by Day 5.
- Observation Cobb and Tracy recovered about 80% PPC at R6.
- Observation Davis recovered about 70% PPC at R6.
- Association Greater photosynthesis recovery at R2 than R6 appeared related to leaf N conservation at R2 and reduction at R6.