Claim · model-written summary
Application methods differed in disease control at the lower fluazinam rates.
- Treatment
- 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha rates of fluaziname0
- Outcome
- disease controle0
- Direction
- Differencese0
- Comparator
- application methodse0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Differences in disease control and yield among application methods only occurred at the 0.28 and 0.56 kg/ha rates of fluazinam.”
Title
J. P. Damicone; K. E. Jackson Peanut Science 2001. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-28-1-8
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation Untreated peanut controls had more than 70% disease incidence.
- Observation Untreated peanut controls yielded less than 2000 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Increasing iprodione rate linearly reduced disease progress area for all application methods.
- Intervention effect Iprodione rate did not significantly reduce final disease incidence.
- Association The rate of decrease in disease progress under iprodione did not differ among application methods.
- Intervention effect Yield rose more strongly with iprodione rate under canopy opener application than band or broadcast application.
- Intervention effect The best iprodione method achieved only a 50% reduction in disease progress area.
- Intervention effect The best iprodione method produced a maximum yield below 2700 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect Fluazinam at 1.12 kg/ha provided more than 75% disease control across application methods.
- Intervention effect Fluazinam at 1.12 kg/ha produced yield above 4000 kg/ha across application methods.
- Association Application methods differed in yield at the lower fluazinam rates.
- Association Disease progress area declined quadratically with fluazinam rate for all application methods.
- Intervention effect At the lower fluazinam rates, band and canopy opener applications gave lower disease progress area than broadcast application.
- Association Broadcast fluazinam application had a linear yield response to rate.
- Association Predicted yield responses to fluazinam rate under band and canopy opener methods were quadratic and approached maximum at 0.84 kg/ha.
- Recommendation Targeted band or canopy opener application was beneficial for fluazinam at reduced rates.
- Recommendation Iprodione disease control was inadequate regardless of application method.