Claim · model-written summary
SPAD measurement was convenient and did not damage leaf growth.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The methods of measuring the SPAD readings are convenient and not destroying leaf growth”
t0“Maize”
Title
Study on the Relationship of SPAD Readings to Nitrogen Content and to Yield in Spring Maize
Jiang Bai-wen Yumi kexue 2011
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Method / resource Lobus leaf SPAD readings were sensitive to nitrogen at the 12, 10 and 8 leaf stages.
- Method / resource Ear leaf SPAD readings were sensitive at tasseling, filling and dough stages.
- Method / resource SPAD readings reflected chlorophyll content and total nitrogen content.
- Method / resource SPAD readings reflected maize yield.
- Method / resource The ten-leaf stage was best for SPAD evaluation of nutritional status and top dressing time.
- Method / resource The twelve-leaf stage was best for early yield prediction using SPAD readings.
- Recommendation The authors recommend SPAD readings as an index of maize yield.