Claim · model-written summary
Returning residues for 3 to 6 years gave greater wheat yield benefits than other durations.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 3 to 6 yre0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- greater benefitse1
- Comparator
- 1–2, 7–10, and ≥11 yre0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“continuing the practice for 3 to 6 yr (compared with 1–2, 7–10, and ≥11 yr)”
e1“The following aspects of CRR and crop management conferred greater benefits in yield”
t0“Wheat”
Title
Yield Responses of Wheat to Crop Residue Returning in China: A Meta‐Analysis
Guangping Qi; Yanxia Kang; Minhua Yin; et al. Crop Science 2019. doi:10.2135/cropsci2019.01.0031
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Crop residue returning significantly increased wheat yield by 8.29% versus no returning.
- Association Residue returning benefited wheat yield more in Northwest China and specified climate, soil and rotation settings.
- Intervention effect Residue rates of 3 to 6 t ha −1 gave greater yield benefits than other rates.
- Intervention effect Chopped straw gave greater wheat yield benefits than intact straw.
- Intervention effect Rainfed conditions gave greater wheat yield benefits than irrigated conditions.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen application at 200 to 300 kg ha −1 gave greater wheat yield benefits than other rates.
- Intervention effect Mulch return increased wheat yield by 12.56%, versus 4.53% with plowing residues into soil.
- Association Spring wheat had an 11.90% yield increase versus 7.09% for winter wheat under residue return.