Claim · model-written summary
Only two 2014 irrigation treatments differed significantly from field average yield.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Outcome
- treatment yieldse0
- Value
- twoe0
- Comparator
- field averagee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2014, only two treatment yields were significantly different from the field average”
t0“Cotton”
Title
Influence of Irrigation Patterns on the Effectiveness of Furrow Irrigation of Cotton
E. D. Vories; A. S. Jones World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2016 2016. doi:10.1061/9780784479858.003
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect All irrigated treatments yielded better than rainfed treatment in 2014.
- Observation Yields in 2015 exceeded those in 2014.
- Observation All 2015 treatment yields differed significantly from the field average.
- Observation Rainfed cotton had the highest canopy temperature in 2014.
- Observation Every third furrow irrigation had the lowest canopy temperature in 2014.
- Observation Every furrow irrigation produced the tallest plants.
- Observation Rainfed treatment produced the shortest plants.
- Observation NDVI was significantly above the field average with every furrow irrigated.
- Observation NDVI was significantly below the field average under rainfed conditions.
- Observation NDVI was significantly below the field average with every third furrow irrigation.