Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FYM at either rate increased weed population and weed dry matter accumulation relative to chemical fertilizers and control

A claim from IMPACT OF NUTRIENT AND WEED MANAGEMENT ON WEED DYNAMICS IN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN AND COSS) UNDER DRYLAND CONDITIONS · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at either rate increased weed population and weed dry matter accumulation relative to chemical fertilizers and control

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceat0
Treatment
FYM at either ratee5
Interactor
weed speCiese5weed
Outcome
population of all the weed speCies and dry matter accumulation by weedse5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
chemical fertilizers and controle5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN AND COSS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–102
e5

“The application of FYM at either rate increased the population of all the weed speCies and dry matter accumulation by weeds over chemical fertilizers and control during both the crop seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1166

Title

IMPACT OF NUTRIENT AND WEED MANAGEMENT ON WEED DYNAMICS IN MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L. CZERN AND COSS) UNDER DRYLAND CONDITIONS

Ishwar Singh; Shubhi Agarwal Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2004

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8a38a6599fe0336ed4e407b934c7a8e35d8e4e1b5dad46806f829eb8fa0cb094 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · weed · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.