Claim · model-written summary
High density offered little advantage over medium density.
- Treatment
- high densitye0
- Outcome
- little advantagee0
- Direction
- little advantagee0
- Comparator
- medium densitye0
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density”
Title
A note on the effect of genotype, density and row width on the yield and quality of forage maize
R. H. Phipps The Journal of Agricultural Science 1975. doi:10.1017/s0021859600052795
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Later maturing maize varieties had higher dry matter yield.
- Association Later maturing maize varieties had lower dry matter percentage.
- Intervention effect Row width did not markedly affect the measured production character.
- Association Density significantly influenced ripe ear.
- Association Variety significantly influenced ripe ear.
- Observation Dried grain per ear was 111 g at low density.
- Observation Dried grain per ear declined to 89 g at medium density.
- Observation Dried grain per ear declined to 74 g at high density.
- Intervention effect Highest density slightly reduced nitrogen content, dry matter digestibility and digestible organic matter.
- Observation Mineral contents except magnesium showed similar trends to the decreases at highest density.