Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The cost-benefit ratio of Decis-impregnated nylon net covering was slightly lower than that of polyethylene bagging (2.11 vs 2.14).

A claim from Effectiveness of weeding and bunch covering in controlling banana leaf and fruit beetle, Nodostoma viridipennis mots · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cost-benefit ratio of Decis-impregnated nylon net covering was slightly lower than that of polyethylene bagging (2.11 vs 2.14).

Taxon
bananae6
Treatment
bunch covering with Decis impregnated nylon nete7
Outcome
cost-benefit ratioe7
Direction
slightly lowere7
Value
2.11e7
Comparator
polyethylene bage7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e6

“The weight of banana of the bunch covered with Decis impregnated nylon net was higher than Polyethylene bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–826
e7

“the cost-benefit ratio of bunch covering with Decis impregnated nylon net was slightly lower (2.11) than polyethylene bag (2.14)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–965

Title

Effectiveness of weeding and bunch covering in controlling banana leaf and fruit beetle, Nodostoma viridipennis mots

Rahman, M. A.; Hossain, M.; Islam, K. S.; et al. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) 2004. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.276357

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8a858f65065818a18cbe06e88f60eafaeaeb4ac09ebf7e5b009ac21bd4439c4c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

trap barrier · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.