Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 40-day cutting schedule generally gave the greatest forage accumulation in the first production year.

A claim from Forage Accumulation and Nutritive Value of Reduced Lignin and Reference Alfalfa Cultivars · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40-day cutting schedule generally gave the greatest forage accumulation in the first production year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
40‐d cutting schedulee0
Outcome
forage accumulatione0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“first production year forage accumulation was generally greatest when alfalfa was harvested on a 40‐d cutting schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1533
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79

Title

Forage Accumulation and Nutritive Value of Reduced Lignin and Reference Alfalfa Cultivars

Amanda M. Grev; M. Scott Wells; Deborah A. Samac; et al. Agronomy Journal 2017. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.04.0237

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8bebb2f0f16e653b5ab5070989dd3f8efef2c079044ef0058368c9c47dc13905 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.