Claim · model-written summary
Four-row weeding efficiency was 85%.
- Taxon
- Finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Outcome
- weeding efficiencye1
- Value
- 85%e1
- Qualifier
- 4 rowse2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Finger millet (Eleusine coracana)”
e1“weeding efficiency (88 & 85%)”
e2“2 rows and 4 rows weeding condition”
Title
Development and evaluation of mechanical weeder for finger millet crop
D.J. Shrinivasa; Shashi Kumar; Murukannappa International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology 2017. doi:10.5958/2230-732x.2017.00025.0
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Method / resource Two-row weeding efficiency was 88%.
- Method / resource Plant damage was 2.5% for two-row weeding.
- Method / resource Plant damage was 3.6% for four-row weeding.
- Method / resource Effective field capacity was 0.108 ha/h for two-row weeding.
- Method / resource Effective field capacity was 0.144 ha/h for four-row weeding.
- Method / resource Field efficiency was 90% for two-row weeding.
- Method / resource Field efficiency was 60% for four-row weeding.
- Method / resource Fuel consumption was 4.181 L/ha for two-row weeding.
- Method / resource Fuel consumption was 3.424 L/ha for four-row weeding.
- Method / resource Weeding cost was 572 for two-row weeding.
- Method / resource Weeding cost was 447.42 for four-row weeding.