Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding achieved the highest weed control efficiency, 93.71%.

A claim from Efficacy of New Herbicide Formulation on the Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding achieved the highest weed control efficiency, 93.71%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Hand weeding on 15 and 30 DASe0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
93.71 %e0
Comparator
among all the treatments examinede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding on 15 and 30 DAS ranked first and resulted in the lowest weed count on 45 DAS (Grasses – 2.73, Sedges – 3.12, BLW’s – 6.34), weed biomass on 30 and 45 DAS (10.89, 6.09 g), weed index (0 %) and highest weed control efficiency (93.71 %) among all the treatments examined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–746
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70

Title

Efficacy of New Herbicide Formulation on the Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

E. Balaji; R. Raman; R. Krishnamoorthy Environment and Ecology 2023. doi:10.60151/envec/nvge3125

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-8cc1a9ba3d64dea9943148b62bfa1d1dd6d64b655e3d4b7c3606d995d2e0b2b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.