Claim · model-written summary
Sulfate reducers produced acetate while utilizing propionate.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Interactor
- Sulfate reducerse0other
- Outcome
- net production of acetatee0
- Direction
- productione0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sulfate reducers, on the other hand, showed net production of acetate during utilization of propionate.”
t0“rice”
Title
Daniel Scheid; Stephan Stubner; Ralf Conrad FEMS Microbiology Ecology 2004. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.001
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Initially, Clostridium, Bacillus and Geobacter/Pelobacter dominated rice root bacterial abundance at about 65%.
- Observation Clostridia decreased after five days in rice root incubation.
- Observation CFB bacteria increased to 30% after five days in rice root incubation.
- Intervention effect Nitrate addition promoted bacterial growth in rice root incubations.
- Intervention effect Sulfate addition promoted bacterial growth in rice root incubations.
- Observation Nitrate or sulfate affected H(2), acetate, propionate and butyrate concentrations in rice root incubations.
- Observation Nitrate reducers apparently consumed H(2), acetate, propionate and butyrate in rice root incubations.
- Observation Nitrate stimulated Bacillus and Dechloromonas activity, with Dechloromonas temporarily reaching 25% of 16S rRNA.
- Intervention effect Nitrate suppressed CFB bacteria in rice root incubations.
- Observation Sulfate stimulated Desulfosporosinus and Geobacter/Pelobacter, reaching about 15% of 16S rRNA.
- Intervention effect Sulfate suppressed CFB activity in rice root incubations.