Observationmodel-written summary

Resistance was more frequent in R-type than W-type isolates.

A claim from Influence of spray programmes on development of fungicide resistance in the eyespot pathogen of wheat, Pseudocercospovella herpotrichoides · 1986

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance was more frequent in R-type than W-type isolates.

Material
R‐typee0
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
more frequente0
Comparator
W‐type isolatese0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistance was found to be more frequent in R‐type than in W‐type isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–489
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101

Title

Influence of spray programmes on development of fungicide resistance in the eyespot pathogen of wheat, Pseudocercospovella herpotrichoides

F. A. HOARE; T. HUNTER; V. W. L. JORDAN Plant Pathology 1986. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.1986.tb02048.x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-8e764145c956ce2a8e0a7ae6f8b856b7c59e0420b812b168856b8ee399b66238 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer