Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Including cowpea in the rotation raised maize grain yield by 78 over the 0 kg N fallow.

A claim from Response of Maize to Cover Crops, Fertilizer Nitrogen Rates, and Economic Return · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Including cowpea in the rotation raised maize grain yield by 78 over the 0 kg N fallow.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cowpeae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
78e1
Comparator
fallow system with 0 kg N ha −1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The mean increase in grain yield as a result of including cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], pigeonpea [ Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.], sunn hemp ( Crotalaria juncea L.), double‐cropped soybean, and double‐cropped grain sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in the rotation over the fallow system with 0 kg N ha −1 was 78, 91, 66, 72, and 12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1228
t0

“Response of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17

Title

Response of Maize to Cover Crops, Fertilizer Nitrogen Rates, and Economic Return

George Y. Mahama; P. V. Vara Prasad; Kraig L. Roozeboom; et al. Agronomy Journal 2015. doi:10.2134/agronj15.0136

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8ec85c0bcecf2d1d96b92ce8d1c4fa9eac1cd39b4780b6f287c2defdedec6f2c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.