Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand-weeding increased green-fodder yield of sorghum by 39.0% over the weedy check.

A claim from Evaluation of different pre-and post-emergence herbicides on forage yield, quality and disease reaction of multi-cut forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding increased green-fodder yield of sorghum by 39.0% over the weedy check.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Hand-weedinge1
Outcome
green-fodder yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
39.0e3
Comparator
weedy checke3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sorghum crop was infested with grassy, broad- leaf weeds and sedges, which reduced 28.1 and 32.7% of green-fodder and dry-fodder yields respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–435
e1

“Hand- weeding (at 20 and 30 days after sowing)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–483
e3

“These 2 treatments enhanced the green-fodder yield by 39.0 and 36.7% and dry-fodder yield by 48.5 and 45.1% respectively, over weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1411

Title

Evaluation of different pre-and post-emergence herbicides on forage yield, quality and disease reaction of multi-cut forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

SUKHPREET SINGH; U.S. TIWANA; MEENAKSHI GOYAL; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v64i1.5239

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8f11c19f3a95562c1764648d4352b831179f1f710dc3779d4f609342905780c6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · SorghumResults differ

66 papers: 52 positive, 14 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.