Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed-free treatment performed better than weedy treatment, with a 23% yield advantage.

A claim from Seeding method and rate influence on weed suppression in aerobic rice · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment performed better than weedy treatment, with a 23% yield advantage.

Taxon
aerobic ricet0
Treatment
Weed free treatmente0
Outcome
yield advantagee0
Direction
performed bettere0
Value
23%e0
Comparator
weedy treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“weed suppression in aerobic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–69
e0

“Weed free treatment performed better with a yield advantage of 23% over weedy treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–658

Title

Seeding method and rate influence on weed suppression in aerobic rice

Anwar Parvez; Abdul Shukor Juraimi; Adam Puteh; et al. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY 2011. doi:10.5897/ajb.9000450

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-90a3bd85ac782432625aab79ae4813dc9551a46a35eac638f23e9d2a3c503383 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this claim · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. no effect
  8. negative

793 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.