Claim · model-written summary
Machine learning methods (PLSR, ANN, RF) performed better than simple linear regression for predicting wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume2 - Outcome
- predicting wheat yielde2
- Direction
- performed bettere2
- Comparator
- Simple linear regression (LR)e3
- Setting
- three regions of Jiangsu Provincee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“This study was carried out on wheat trials treated with different nitrogen levels and seeding densities in three regions of Jiangsu Province in 2018–2019”
e2“Machine learning methods (i.e., PLSR, ANN, and RF) performed better for predicting wheat yield”
e3“Simple linear regression (LR), multiple linear regression (MLR), stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR)”
Title
Wheat Growth Monitoring and Yield Estimation based on Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Zhaopeng Fu; Jie Jiang; Yang Gao; et al. Remote Sensing 2020. doi:10.3390/rs12030508
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Association The vegetation index combining red edge and near-infrared bands was significantly correlated with LAI and LDM in wheat.
- Method / resource The RF model using NDVI at four growth stages was the optimal wheat yield estimation model, with an R2 of 0.78.
- Method / resource The optimal wheat yield estimation model had a relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 0.1030.
- Recommendation A multi-spectral camera on a multi-rotor UAV has a broad application prospect for wheat growth index monitoring and yield estimation.