Claim · model-written summary
Lr2a was relatively effective against wheat leaf rust.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Interactor
- leaf rustt0pathogen
- Gene
- Lr2ae0
- Outcome
- Relatively effectivee0
Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat Leaf Rust”
e0“Relatively effective were also Lr1, Lr2a, Lr24, Lr28 and Lr2b”
Title
Alena Hanzalová; Pavel Bartoš Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 2006. doi:10.17221/3642-cjgpb
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Lr9 resisted all tested wheat leaf rust isolates.
- Observation Lr19 resisted all tested wheat leaf rust isolates.
- Observation Virulence on wheat Lr24 was observed, unlike previous years.
- Observation Virulence on wheat Lr28 was observed, unlike previous years.
- Observation Lr1 was relatively effective against wheat leaf rust.
- Observation Lr24 was relatively effective against wheat leaf rust.
- Observation Lr28 was relatively effective against wheat leaf rust.
- Observation Lr2b was relatively effective against wheat leaf rust.
- Observation Most tested rust isolates overcame the other wheat Lr genes.
- Observation Race 61SaBa was the most prevalent wheat leaf rust race, as in previous years.
- Observation The other listed rust races followed race 61SaBa in prevalence.
- Observation Fifteen of 21 winter wheat cultivars resisted at least one rust isolate.
- Observation Batis showed high field resistance although susceptible to all tested rust isolates at the seedling stage.
- Observation Ilias showed high field resistance although susceptible to all tested rust isolates at the seedling stage.