Claim · model-written summary
Automatic monitor yield differed from actual yield by (+) 2.8 to (+)5.1 per cent.
- Taxon
- paddy cropt0
- Outcome
- Variation in actual yield and yield measured by automatic yield monitore0
- Value
- (+) 2.8 to (+)5.1 per cente0
- Comparator
- actual yielde0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
e0“Variation in actual yield and yield measured by automatic yield monitor varied from (+) 2.8 to (+)5.1 per cent.”
t0“Paddy Crop”
Title
Yield Variability Assessment in Paddy Crop using Automatic Yield Monitoring System
N. S. Chandel; K. N. Agrawal Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 2019. doi:10.52151/jae2019563.1687
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Method / resource The yield monitor calibration factor for paddy crop was 6.79.
- Method / resource A one-hectare plot was divided into five yield zones spanning below 1900 to above 5000 kg.ha-1.
- Observation Maximum temporal yield variability was 14.7% between 2014 and 2017.
- Method / resource The monitoring system showed real-time temporal and spatial yield variation in the paddy field.