Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seeds of the cultivar Najed weighed 1.5 times more than non-inoculated seeds

A claim from Secondary Metabolites Produced by the Epiphytic Actinobacteria of Wild Desert Plants: Growth Promoting and Pathogen Suppressing Potential of Streptomyces microflavus in Wheat Growing Under Water‐Deficit Conditions · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds of the cultivar Najed weighed 1.5 times more than non-inoculated seeds

Material
Najede4
Treatment
S. microflavus inoculatione0
Outcome
seedse4
Direction
weighede4
Value
1.5 times moree4
Comparator
non‐inoculated seedse4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A greenhouse experiment was carried out to study the effect of S. microflavus inoculation on six wheat cultivars in extreme drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1548
e4

“The seeds of the inoculated cultivar Rafha weighed three times more, and the seeds of the cultivar Najed weighed 1.5 times more compared to the non‐inoculated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2068–2232

Title

Secondary Metabolites Produced by the Epiphytic Actinobacteria of Wild Desert Plants: Growth Promoting and Pathogen Suppressing Potential of Streptomyces microflavus in Wheat Growing Under Water‐Deficit Conditions

Fadaa Alown; Nouf Al‐Enazi; Eman Alhomaidi; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2025. doi:10.1111/ppl.70697

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-944e849b5917c429a9e30cf4edd0a63dc92bce95821a224104925277dc48ab6c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 16 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.