Multiple diskharrowing gave a profit of 77,20 HRK/ha, below conventional tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Multiple Diskharrowinge2
Outcome: profite7
Direction: followed bye7
Value: 77,20 HRK/hae7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Zea mays* · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0
“YIELD OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28

e2
“DH) Multiple Diskharrowing”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–528

e7
“The highest profit was achieved at CT treatment (665,34 HRK/ha), followed by CH (189,24 HRK/ha), DH (77,20 HRK/ha), PD (-334,95 HRK/ha) and NT (-459,81 HRK/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1170

Title

YIELD OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) ON DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE VARIANTS

Danijel Jug; Bojan Stipešević; Irena Jug; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2006

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect No-tillage gave the lowest maize yield, 5.94 t/ha.
Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave the highest profit, 665,34 HRK/ha.
Intervention effect Chiseling and diskharrowing gave a profit of 189,24 HRK/ha, below conventional tillage.
Intervention effect One diskharrowing pass gave a negative profit of -334,95 HRK/ha.
Intervention effect No-tillage gave a negative profit of -459,81 HRK/ha, the lowest of the systems.

Record rev-946eba2acfca148527661072a4176b78231ee88c3605590120414567ac54495f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer