Claim · model-written summary
Overdominance operated for all traits except the stated F1 and F1/F2 exceptions.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Outcome
- Overdominancee0
- Qualifier
- except days to flower and number of pods per plant in F1 and number of seeds per pod and test weight in both F1 and F2e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Overdominance was operative for all the traits except days to flower and number of pods per plant in F1 and number of seeds per pod and test weight in both F1 and F2.”
t0“Chickpea”
Title
Genetic Architecture of Yield and its Components in Chickpea
R. P. Katiyar; Dharampal Singh Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The) 1979
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation General and specific combining ability variances were substantial for the studied chickpea characters.
- Observation General combining ability accounted for more total variability than specific combining ability.
- Observation Additive gene action predominated for test weight.
- Observation Days to flower and pods per plant showed additive action in F1.
- Observation Days to flower and pods per plant showed non-additive action in F2.
- Observation Non-additive action predominated for plant height, maturity timing, reproductive phase timing and grain yield in F1 and F2.
- Observation Six parental strains were promising by general combining ability effects.