Claim · model-written summary
SEM attributed PAR interception differences directly to differences between CR and common urea application.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- differences in N applicatione0
- Outcome
- PAR ie0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Structural equation model (SEM) analysis showed that differences in N application, between CR and common urea, directly accounted for differences observed in soil nutrient, PAR i and NUE rather than yield components.”
t0“rice”
Title
Chuang Liu; Yixiang Sun; Gang Wu; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12294
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Controlled release urea significantly increased rice grain yield.
- Intervention effect Controlled release urea significantly increased rice NUE.
- Intervention effect Controlled release urea significantly increased rice leaf morpho-physiological attributes.
- Intervention effect Controlled release urea with common urea increased LAI, CCI, and intercepted PAR relative to local practice.
- Intervention effect The combined urea treatment increased NUE in early rice by 24.4% against local practice.
- Intervention effect The combined urea treatment increased NUE in late rice by 25.3% against local practice.
- Intervention effect The combined urea treatment produced higher grain yield than local practice.
- Association SEM attributed soil nutrient differences directly to differences between CR and common urea application.
- Association SEM attributed NUE differences directly to differences between CR and common urea application.
- Method / resource LAI and intercepted PAR between booting and filling predicted and explained early rice grain yield with R² of 0.69.
- Method / resource LAI and intercepted PAR between booting and filling predicted and explained late rice grain yield with R² of 0.92.