Claim · model-written summary
Two hand weedings and the pendimethalin, imazethapyr and hand weeding sequence were at par for yield and returns.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- two hand weeding at 25 and 50 DASe0
- Outcome
- Yield, Gross returns and Net returnse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- Pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 fb Imazethapyr @ 100 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS fb one hand weeding at 50 DASe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two hand weeding at 25 and 50 DAS which is at par with Pendimethalin @ 1.0 kg a.i. ha-1 fb Imazethapyr @ 100 g a.i. ha-1 at 25 DAS fb one hand weeding at 50 DAS with respect to Yield, Gross returns and Net returns”
e1“in pigeonpea”
Title
N.R. Sandya; R.S. Singh International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.421
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Weed density and biomass increased as pigeonpea sowing was delayed from 11 June to 9 July.
- Intervention effect Sowing on 11 June gave minimum weed loss of 13.42% and 12.68% in the two years.
- Intervention effect Two hand weedings gave significantly fewer weeds and lower weed dry weight than other practices.
- Intervention effect W4 had minimum weed loss of 2.89% and 2.41%.
- Intervention effect Pigeonpea yield, gross and net returns, and benefit-cost ratio were superior with 11 June sowing versus later sowing.
- Intervention effect Benefit-cost ratio was higher with the pendimethalin and imazethapyr sequence.