Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free treatment was not cost-effective because manual weeding was expensive.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
e0“weed free treatment but not cost-effective due to high cost in manual weed operation”
Title
Performance of herbicide on yield and economic returns of pigeonpea Cajanus cajan L Millsp in Bihar
S Suman; G.S. Panwar; M G Mula; et al. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) 2016
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Uncontrolled weeds reduced pigeonpea yield by 40.53% relative to other treatments.
- Intervention effect Weed-free treatment had the highest seed yield, 2,725 kg/ha.
- Observation Imazethapyr at 40 g a.i./ha at 15 DAS had a 7.25% weed index, the lowest herbicide-treatment value.
- Intervention effect The imazethapyr treatment yielded 2,526 kg/ha seed.
- Intervention effect The imazethapyr treatment produced net returns of ? 71,059/ha.
- Intervention effect The imazethapyr treatment had a benefit:cost ratio of 2.74.