Claim · model-written summary
Reproductive FAW damage was 8.8–21.2%.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with associated damage of 8.8–21.2% (severity factor: 0.80)”
t0“maize”
Title
Mandla Rajashekhar; C. Narendra Reddy; Kalisetti Vanisree; et al. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2025. doi:10.56557/upjoz/2025/v46i175216
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation Vegetative FAW incidence ranged from 22.0% to 70.0%.
- Observation Vegetative FAW incidence reached 70.0% in Palem.
- Observation Mean vegetative FAW incidence was 48.46%.
- Observation Vegetative FAW proportional losses were estimated at 18.26–58.10%.
- Observation Reproductive FAW incidence declined to 11.0–36.0%.
- Observation Mean reproductive FAW incidence was 20.13%.
- Observation Severe vegetative FAW pressure occurred in 12.5% of villages.
- Observation Reproductive FAW infestation above 30% occurred in 8.3% of villages.
- Observation Vegetative PSB incidence ranged from 10.0% to 44.0%.
- Observation PSB incidence reached 44.0% in Khanapur.
- Observation Mean vegetative PSB incidence was 22.77%.
- Observation PSB damage estimates ranged from 8.10% to 36.72%.
- Observation PSB infestation was high in 8.3% of villages.
- Observation PSB infestation was moderate in 33.3% of villages.
- Observation PSB infestation was low-moderate in 41.7% of villages.
- Observation PSB infestation was low in 16.7% of villages.
- Observation FAW pressure peaked early in crop growth.
- Observation PSB incidence persisted heterogeneously in the vegetative stage.
- Recommendation The authors recommend stage-specific, zone-oriented pest management.