Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pigeonpea + sorghum intercropping was most remunerative in B: C ratio (2.74 at 1:1).

A claim from Performance of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Intercropping as Influenced by Row Ratios and Nutri Cereal Crops · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + sorghum intercropping was most remunerative in B: C ratio (2.74 at 1:1).

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportionse4
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
most remunerativee4
Value
2.74e4
Qualifier
2.63e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40
e4

“intercropping of pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportions was most remunerative with net returns and B: C ratio of 46,597 Rs ha-1 and 2.74 and 44,068 Rs ha-1 and 2.63 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1191

Title

Performance of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Intercropping as Influenced by Row Ratios and Nutri Cereal Crops

Mallik arjun; B. G. Koppalkar; B. K. Desai; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.314

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a4fa500bf608eb06b32bcd73bc4161adb486cf62b26971f80674273df3df7f77 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Sorghum · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.