Claim · model-written summary
Fertilisation significantly increased yield under both irrigated and non-irrigated conditions.
- Treatment
- fertilisatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Qualifier
- both non-irrigated and irrigated conditionse0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield increasing effect of fertilisation was significant in the case of both non-irrigated and irrigated conditions”
t0“maize”
Title
Using research findings in precision maize production
János Nagy; Adrienn Ványiné Széles Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 2012. doi:10.34101/actaagrar/49/2531
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Autumn ploughing gave the highest maize yield.
- Association The effect of autumn ploughing differed between irrigated and nonirrigated treatments.
- Recommendation Periodic strip cultivation is recommended on favourable soils without compacted layers.
- Association Higher plant numbers were favourable in years with average or above-average precipitation.
- Recommendation Under dry conditions, a plant number no higher than 60 thousand per hectare is recommended.
- Recommendation With favourable water supply, 70-80 thousand plants per hectare can be used.
- Association The fertilisation yield effect was more moderate without irrigation.
- Association Previous crop significantly affected weed coverage.
- Intervention effect Weed coverage was lower after wheat than after maize.
- Association After maize, weed coverage depended mainly on crop year and precipitation.
- Intervention effect Irrigation without intensive nutrient management led to declining yields.
- Method / resource The research contributed to a method for locally differentiated seed, fertiliser and pesticide application and plot operations.