Claim · model-written summary
HQPM-1 had economic yield of 8.8 t/ha.
Zea maysNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WINTER MAIZE”
e0“HQPM-1 (8.8, 2.1 and 748)”
e1“economic yield (t/ha)”
Title
EFFECT OF TILLAGE ON PERFORMANCE OF WINTER MAIZE IN NORTHERN INDIA
M. L. Jat; Ashish Srivastava; R. K. Gupta 2006
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Highest-yielding varieties had similar yields on no-till permanent beds and conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect No-till permanent beds increased grain yield by 4% versus conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect No-till permanent beds increased profitability by 20% versus conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect No-till permanent beds increased yield by 16% versus no-till flat ground.
- Intervention effect No-till permanent beds increased profitability by 24% versus no-till flat ground.
- Intervention effect Permanent beds increased irrigation water productivity by 42% versus conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Permanent beds increased irrigation water productivity by 35% versus no-till flat ground.
- Observation Bio-9681 had economic yield of 9.4 t/ha.
- Observation Bio-9681 had water productivity of 2.3 kg grain m -3 water.
- Observation Bio-9681 had profitability of 814 US$/ha.
- Observation ST-2324 had economic yield of 9.3 t/ha.
- Observation ST-2324 had water productivity of 2.3 kg grain m -3 water.
- Observation ST-2324 had profitability of 804 US$/ha.
- Observation HQPM-1 had water productivity of 2.1 kg grain m -3 water.
- Observation HQPM-1 had profitability of 748 US$/ha.
- Intervention effect After one year, no-till systems improved soil physical properties over conventional tillage.