Claim · model-written summary
Grain yields were 30–35 % higher on the upslope than the downslope side.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“the grain yields were 30–35 % higher at the upslope than downslope side”
e0“maize height, grain yield, and leaf nitrogen (N) concentrations were significantly higher at the upslope than downslope side of tree-grass rows”
Title
Van Hung Do; Nguyen La; Göran Bergkvist; et al. Field Crops Research 2024. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109675
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Observation Maize height, grain yield and leaf nitrogen concentrations were higher on the upslope than the downslope side of tree-grass rows.
- Observation SOC, total N and total P tended to be higher on the upslope than the downslope side of tree-grass rows.
- Observation Available P and available K tended to be higher on the upslope than the downslope side of tree-grass rows.
- Mechanism Forage grass strips trapped nitrogen and other nutrients and enhanced nutrient use efficiency in the agroforestry.
- Observation Maize performance and soil fertility mid-way between tree-grass rows were comparable to sole-crop maize.
- Recommendation Such variability should be considered for effective application of nutrients in agroforestry.