Claim · model-written summary
Wheat did not show its promise as a follow-up crop without input of water and fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- without input of water and fertilizere1
- Outcome
- promisee1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Wheat, however, did not show its promise as a follow‐up crop without input of water and fertilizer”
Title
S. Adhikary; D. K. Bagchi; P. Ghosal; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1991.tb00959.x
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Observation Maize-groundnut intercropping was the best system.
- Intervention effect Intercropping gave yield advantages of 22-44% over sole maize cropping.
- Observation Different production indices showed the same pattern in ranking intercropping treatments.
- Observation Mung showed potential as an intercrop with maize.
- Observation Cowpea and soyabean did not show potential as intercrops with maize.
- Intervention effect Increasing cropping intensity through legume interspace did not significantly reduce maize yield.
- Observation Legume cultivation enriched soil nitrogen.