Claim · model-written summary
Fungal isolate and wettable powder forms did not differ significantly in reduction of cotton boll infestation.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- isolate form of fungie0
- Outcome
- reduction percentages of bolls infestatione0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- wettable powdere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no significant difference between the isolate form of fungi and wettable powder in reduction percentages of bolls infestation”
t0“On Cotton”
Title
Rehab, Dar; Dalia, Lotfy; Hemat, Moustafa Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 2020. doi:10.21608/eajbsa.2020.69092
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect All tested bio-insecticides significantly reduced Earias insulana larvae on cotton.
- Intervention effect Metarhizium anisopliae with the Economy Micron ULVA gave the greatest reduction in cotton boll infestation.
- Intervention effect Beauveria bassiana with the Economy Micron ULVA gave a greater reduction in cotton boll infestation than Bacillus thuringiensis with a hand-held sprayer.
- Intervention effect Bacillus thuringiensis with the hand-held sprayer ranked after the fungal treatments for reducing boll infestation.
- Recommendation The authors recommend bio-insecticides with ULV equipment at no less than 15 L/Fed.
- Method / resource The spray obtained satisfactory coverage on cotton plants.
- Method / resource Spray droplets had a spectrum of 130–166 mm VMD.
- Method / resource The droplet count ranged from 24 to 170 N/cm².
- Method / resource The Matabi hand-held sprayer covered 3.5 Fed./day.
- Method / resource The Economy Micron ULVA covered 3 Fed./day, the lowest sprayer performance rate.
- Recommendation The authors recommend bio-insecticides in integrated pest management because of their stated safety.
- Method / resource Low-volume spraying reduced refill time and spray lost on the ground.