Claim · model-written summary
Leuceana was superior to Eucalyptus for P and secondary nutrients.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the latter was superior with relation to P and secondary nutrients”
t0“Eucalyptus tereticornis Smith and Leuceana leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit”
Title
S. Bhadraray; Y. S. Rao; Nisar Ahmed The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1999
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Rainfed plantations depleted major nutrients and zinc compared with fallow.
- Association Eucalyptus preserved soil N and K better than Leuceana.
- Observation Micronutrients showed no definite trend across plantations.
- Intervention effect Wheat grain yield with irrigated Eucalyptus soil was at par with recommended fertilizer dose in fallow.
- Intervention effect Wheat grain yield with Leuceana soil was significantly lower.
- Association Available N, P, K and Zn controlled wheat grain yield.